
The classic perky bunny
TOPLESS AND BOTTOMLESS VERSION AVAILABLE PLEASE SUPPORT ME SO I CAN DRAW MORE TITTIES FOR YOU ALL: https://subscribestar.adult/slugbox
Twitter for more consistent posts: https://twitter.com/slugbox/status/136876647030659
TOPLESS AND BOTTOMLESS VERSION AVAILABLE PLEASE SUPPORT ME SO I CAN DRAW MORE TITTIES FOR YOU ALL: https://subscribestar.adult/slugbox
Twitter for more consistent posts: https://twitter.com/slugbox/status/136876647030659
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Gender Any
Size 3155 x 4008px
File Size 7.13 MB
Technically the flat chested is the classic form, but I do love this art so much. <3 <3 <3
Any reason for more Lola is fine by me, even if it's from twitter controversy lmao(I left months ago because of things like this every other week was exhausting).
Any reason for more Lola is fine by me, even if it's from twitter controversy lmao(I left months ago because of things like this every other week was exhausting).
It took me about five minutes of reading and looking up the initial concept art, but yeah I'm right.
AFABs with flat chests have been dealing with mainstream society calling them "teenaged boys" or "children" forever, so seeing this happen to my homegirl Lola is very sad. I think she's gorgeous at any cup size or none at all. Nerds need to stop caring so much about sex appeal and work to make ALL boob-havers feel accepted and not objectified. :)
AFABs with flat chests have been dealing with mainstream society calling them "teenaged boys" or "children" forever, so seeing this happen to my homegirl Lola is very sad. I think she's gorgeous at any cup size or none at all. Nerds need to stop caring so much about sex appeal and work to make ALL boob-havers feel accepted and not objectified. :)
This is not "nerds" only accepting huge tits or some shit, this is about a female character being altered because the director was disgusted by her femininity and viewed it as antithetical to strength and capability. Funny how it's always totally fine for all these "woke" types to judge female characters by their boob sizes, how pretty their faces are and what they're wearing, literally bodyshame them and any real women who look like them, and ignore everything else about them or even deny there IS anything else...
I also didn't dispute what you'd said about the initial concept, only your claim that a design that never left initial concept work and even had a different name is the "true" classic Lola.
I also didn't dispute what you'd said about the initial concept, only your claim that a design that never left initial concept work and even had a different name is the "true" classic Lola.
Honestly I don’t spend any time on Twitter so I am not even seeing the outrage first hand, only hearing about it through friends who are seeing it unfold and summarizing for me.
The initial design for the character was a flat chested tomboy, she was labelled as not performing femininity well enough, so they edited the design to be sexy and changed the name to match. That’s how character design works in movies, and all that art is canon. You can chalk it up to the fact she was created by a team, and times change politically so now she can have her flat chest and not have her femininity questioned. 🙄
Putting woke in quotation marks and throwing shade at progressives is also not a very good look. I never said or did anything related to all what you typed, and it feels like you’ve painted a nasty image in your mind of me without even knowing me; so I’m just gonna block you and avoid any further drama. 🤗✌️
I only came here to say: the art is amazing, people who judge women based on their bodies are trash, and society is always shaming women for not being feminine enough or objectifying us for our boob size etc, and that behaviour needs to stop.
The initial design for the character was a flat chested tomboy, she was labelled as not performing femininity well enough, so they edited the design to be sexy and changed the name to match. That’s how character design works in movies, and all that art is canon. You can chalk it up to the fact she was created by a team, and times change politically so now she can have her flat chest and not have her femininity questioned. 🙄
Putting woke in quotation marks and throwing shade at progressives is also not a very good look. I never said or did anything related to all what you typed, and it feels like you’ve painted a nasty image in your mind of me without even knowing me; so I’m just gonna block you and avoid any further drama. 🤗✌️
I only came here to say: the art is amazing, people who judge women based on their bodies are trash, and society is always shaming women for not being feminine enough or objectifying us for our boob size etc, and that behaviour needs to stop.
Thanks for blocking me before you could hear any sort of further counterargument or explanation.
No, what's canon is what makes it into the final cut. By your logic, Abel from Street Fighter is in fact a young girl, Aladdin's genie is red and Mario punches Yoshi in the head to make him stick his tongue out.
I also never said you did that, that's what people like the director of Space Jam 2 constantly do though. And you're right, they are trash. Trash that pretends to care about women for brownie points and shows its true colours at the slightest hint of a titty or defiance.
No, what's canon is what makes it into the final cut. By your logic, Abel from Street Fighter is in fact a young girl, Aladdin's genie is red and Mario punches Yoshi in the head to make him stick his tongue out.
I also never said you did that, that's what people like the director of Space Jam 2 constantly do though. And you're right, they are trash. Trash that pretends to care about women for brownie points and shows its true colours at the slightest hint of a titty or defiance.
I don't think what you are describing is body shaming. Saying what you like doesn't mean you are criticizing what you don't like. If a girl says a boy is cute, is she body shaming every boy who isn't as cute? You are confusing "body shaming" with being petty and jealous. Trust me, no matter what body type you are, there is someone out there that will love it. When people talk like this it sound more like they are saying "I'm attracted to cute boy, but cute boy only likes cute girl. I'm not a cute girl but I want cute boy. Therefore, cute boy needs to lower his standards so I can have cute boy!". And I'm betting you are ignoring more boys because of their bodies then you are getting ignored by boys because of your body.
What's I'm describing as bodyshaming is the director's mindset, this mentality that feminine traits and sexualized characters are inherently bad, and that characters like Lola are somehow horribly offensive to women and what he's had done to her in this new movie somehow "fixes" her and only now lets her be strong and capable. It's a mix of bodyshaming, sex-negativity and just white-knighting for a group that doesn't want to be white-knighted.
For context, the director of Space Jam 2 had never seen the first movie until after being hired for this one. He watched it, saw Lola for the first time, and admits to having been shocked and disgusted by her, stating in an interview that he set out to change her and flaunt how much he "respects" women, even literally using the line "It's 2021" as justification. He pretty much directly said that he feels it's impossible for a woman to be strong and sexy at the same time, which is a disturbingly common sentiment among so-called "feminists" these days, he believes she had no personality, strength or competence before now, and he's pulling the classic move of trying to speak over women on their behalf by assuming the position of "Women are offended by classic Lola, they'll thank us for the new one, no question about it."
THAT, more than anything, is what's got people upset.
For context, the director of Space Jam 2 had never seen the first movie until after being hired for this one. He watched it, saw Lola for the first time, and admits to having been shocked and disgusted by her, stating in an interview that he set out to change her and flaunt how much he "respects" women, even literally using the line "It's 2021" as justification. He pretty much directly said that he feels it's impossible for a woman to be strong and sexy at the same time, which is a disturbingly common sentiment among so-called "feminists" these days, he believes she had no personality, strength or competence before now, and he's pulling the classic move of trying to speak over women on their behalf by assuming the position of "Women are offended by classic Lola, they'll thank us for the new one, no question about it."
THAT, more than anything, is what's got people upset.
I feel like we are moving back into the territory of calling women "bimbos" again. We went full circle from going "just because I'm attractive that doesn't mean I'm stupid" to "because I'm attractive that does mean I'm stupid". It is like they want girls to say "If people see I have a mature body they won't see my mature personality."
I have to agree. She was basically a smart jock who hated being objectified. They could have gone so many different ways with that her educational background what got her into sports in the first place why she was so bloody competitive instead they decided to make her a bleeding airhead. Hecht as far as negative things go they could have his story arcs about her being over competitive and it blowing up in her face. There's any number of ways that they could have developed her character.
To be fair, the Looney Tunes comics handled her well, making her fit in a bit better with the rest of the cast (ie. making her a bit goofier and having her drop one-liners with Bugs-level precision) while not changing her visually and still keeping key character elements from Space Jam. It was The Looney Tunes Show that dropped the ball by turning her into what every bad fanfic writer thinks Amy Rose acts like.
Comments